These are my random musings. Hopefully they will be witty, insightful, and frequently updated.
Al-Qaeda talking truce with US
Published on January 19, 2006 By singrdave In War on Terror
Here's an unexpected turn of events. He claims that despite al-Qaeda's preparations for fresh US attacks, he wants to sue for peace. He claims that he's got several projects underway and the only way we can prevent them from happening is to accede to bin Laden's demands. He claims that he doesn't want to fight any more, but can we take it at face value?

From Yahoo News:
Osama bin Laden warned that al Qaeda was preparing new attacks inside the United States, but said the group was open to a conditional truce with Americans, according to an audio tape attributed to him on Thursday.



"The operations are under preparation and you will see them in your houses as soon as they are complete, God willing," said the speaker on the audio tape, who sounded like bin Laden.

In the tape, broadcast by al Jazeera television, bin Laden said al Qaeda was willing to respond to public U.S. opinion in favor of withdrawing troops from Iraq.

"We have no objection to responding to this with a long term truce based on fair conditions."

It was not immediately known when the tape was recorded. A U.S. counterterrorism official said U.S. intelligence was assessing the tape in an effort to determine its authenticity.

Bin Laden issued an audio tape in April 2004 in which he also offered a truce -- on that occasion to Europe, but not to the United States. Analysts saw the move at the time as an attempt to drive a wedge between the United States and its allies and to scare wavering coalition members out of Iraq.

Bin Laden's last audio tape was in December 2004. The interval between then and now was by far his longest public silence since the September 11 attacks on the United States in 2001.


Wow, what a shocker. It's a surprising turn of events and an intriguing offer. But not believable. "Death to Americans" has been their rallying cry for so long. Why is it suddenly "live and let live"?

Comments (Page 2)
5 Pages1 2 3 4  Last
on Jan 19, 2006
yall are really making too much of this tape.

first of all, it's audio only (which says a lot--it aint like al quaeda shies away from video).

secondly, it's clearly evidence of weakness (altho his admirers may not be able or willing to see it that way).

thirdly, he could have easily read a couple pages of listings from the peshawar phone book (if there is such a thing) because the apparent message isn't what the tape is all about. nobody but the truly deluded is gonna be convinced he's really offering terms. instead, this tape is obviously intended to assure his supporters and sympathizers he's still alive & free. (i'm not contending it's benign by any means...as long as he remains that way or his associates are able to maintain that image, we're in danger.)

Liberals say.....let's go for the truce.


speaking of the truly deluded. time for your meds dog.
on Jan 19, 2006
It's obviously a tactic to help feed the division in the US. Think about it, if we reject the idea the Dems will protest that we had a chance to settle things with them (knowing it's all bull) and yet we throughthru it out the windows and another round of Bush Bashing will begin.

I would find it interesting and funny to actually see the US consider the idea. It could be used as a tactical advantage, make Osama come out of hiding to conduct negotiations himself and BAM!!!!, "someone" took advantage and killed him. (not a likely scenario but one can dream).

In the end I have to agree with drmiller. I second that motion.
on Jan 19, 2006
The question is, what have they noticed?


the question should be, if you're not joking--have i really overestimated you this badly?
on Jan 19, 2006
The question is, what have they noticed?


Maybe they noticed that the resident troll ( I believe you all know who he is) is giving them bad PR and so they decided to give up.
on Jan 19, 2006

the question should be, if you're not joking--have i really overestimated you this badly?


I never got the idea that you somehow held me in high regard. You never said.

Nevertheless, I was referring to an earlier article of mine where I made the case that Al-Qaeda made a mistake when they overestimated popular support among Sunnis.

It's possible that Al-Qaeda have noticed. Somebody might have told them. They clearly didn't know in the past. (Otherwise they would not have attacked a Palestinian-run hotel in Jordan.)
on Jan 19, 2006
It's obviously a tactic to help feed the division in the US. Think about it, if we reject the idea the Dems will protest that we had a chance to settle things with them (knowing it's all bull) and yet we throughthru it out the windows and another round of Bush Bashing will begin


apparently i was wrong in thinking only osama's zombified supporters would be sucked into thinking he was actually making a peace overture. apparently bush's zombified supporters are equally susceptible to this kinda thing.
on Jan 19, 2006
Maybe they noticed that the resident troll ( I believe you all know who he is) is giving them bad PR and so they decided to give up.


you're gonna give drmiler a swelled head with that kinda talk.

seriously? maybe monkeys are gonna be flyin outta my butt
on Jan 19, 2006
So let me get this straight: he wants a truce, so that we can finish rebuilding Iraq and Afghanistan in peace, and he can finish his preparations for his next big set-piece terrorist massacre in peace.

Fuck that. I say we keep up the fighting until it's over.
on Jan 19, 2006
DJ:
I would find it interesting and funny to actually see the US consider the idea. It could be used as a tactical advantage, make Osama come out of hiding to conduct negotiations himself and BAM!!!!, "someone" took advantage and killed him.

Your scenario reminds me of David Letterman's first broadcast from Afghanistan, where he announced that the winner of a brand new Buick Skylark was... Osama bin Laden! Now would he please come to Camp X-Ray to claim his prize...

Kingbee:
apparently i was wrong in thinking only osama's zombified supporters would be sucked into thinking he was actually making a peace overture. apparently bush's zombified supporters are equally susceptible to this kinda thing.

Oh, so now it's "zombified" to hope that this is sincere? I think everyone, both sides of the aisle, hopes for peace. This tape should be received with optimism, then scrutinized for "genuiniosity".

Besides, the only people who will pretend to take this overture seriously will be partisans who see a political advantage to do so.
on Jan 19, 2006
Hey, if Yasir Arafat can go from baby killer to statesman, so can Osama, right? Let's put him up for the 2020 Nobel Peace Prize, shall we?
on Jan 19, 2006

Let's put him up for the 2020 Nobel Peace Prize, shall we?

I think he is going for next year's award!

on Jan 19, 2006
and somebody in JU accused me of imagining some ficticious use of"propaganda" by the bacteria. ;~D
on Jan 19, 2006
apparently i was wrong in thinking only osama's zombified supporters would be sucked into thinking he was actually making a peace overture. apparently bush's zombified supporters are equally susceptible to this kinda thing.


Oh kingbee you definitely are good for a few laughs. If I throw a stick will you go fetch as well?
on Jan 19, 2006
Let's put him up for the 2020 Nobel Peace Prize, shall we?

I think he is going for next year's award!


That would be a very Machiavellian way to get a Nobel:

Start a war on 9/11, and then offer your own peace five years later.
on Jan 19, 2006
Start a war on 9/11, and then offer your own peace five years later.


Well, it seemed to work well for Arafat. Why not Osama?
5 Pages1 2 3 4  Last