These are my random musings. Hopefully they will be witty, insightful, and frequently updated.
Disproving Iraq invasion 'evidence' off the top of my head
Published on February 3, 2006 By singrdave In War on Terror
Found this article at the Independent.co.uk:

It is complete garbage, and I'll tell you why after the article.



George Bush considered provoking a war with Saddam Hussein's regime by flying a United States spyplane over Iraq bearing UN colours, enticing the Iraqis to take a shot at it, according to a leaked memo of a meeting between the US President and Tony Blair.

The two leaders were worried by the lack of hard evidence that Saddam Hussein had broken UN resolutions, though privately they were convinced that he had. According to the memorandum, Mr Bush said: "The US was thinking of flying U2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, painted in UN colours. If Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach."

The memo damningly suggests the decision to invade Iraq had already been made when Mr Blair and the US President met in Washington on 31 January 2003 ­ when the British Government was still working on obtaining a second UN resolution to legitimise the conflict.

The leaders discussed the prospects for a second resolution, but Mr Bush said: "The US would put its full weight behind efforts to get another resolution and would 'twist arms' and 'even threaten'. But he had to say that if ultimately we failed, military action would follow anyway." He added that he had a date, 10 March, pencilled in for the start of military action. The war actually began on 20 March.

Mr Blair replied that he was "solidly with the President and ready to do whatever it took to disarm Saddam." But he also insisted that " a second Security Council resolution would provide an insurance policy against the unexpected, and international cover, including with the Arabs" .


This is complete and utter bullcrap. I can say this with a great degree of certainty, for the following reasons:



1. A U2 aircraft flies far above the limit of a surface-to-air or air defense missile. 70,000 feet (approx.) is a long way for a targeting computer or a missile.

2. You can't see the "UN Colors" of a U2 aircraft, especially from the ground. If you can see anything at all, it's a streak of contrail. Again with the 70,000 feet... you'd have to be the Six-Million Dollar Man to view the flag on the side of a U2.

3. Saddam's air defense had been taking potshots at Operation Northern Watch and Southern Watch aircraft for many many years. If the "coalition of the willing" was trying to make a case based on Saddam firing one missile at one plane, then they could have invaded in 1994.

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 03, 2006
bumpity bump
on Feb 03, 2006
It brings into question the other "supposed" Bush Blair memos that the Independant has outed.  Now that they have been caught in an outright fabrication, anything they have or will say on the subject should be doubted first and beleived not at all.
on Feb 03, 2006

The two leaders were worried by the lack of hard evidence that Saddam Hussein had broken UN resolutions, though privately they were convinced that he had.


Well, the UN security council determined that Saddam had broken UN resolutions, so I suppose we have to believe the Independent when it says that Bush and Blair were privately convinced that he had.
on Feb 04, 2006
Bush and Blair were privately convinced that he had.

Bush, Blair, and the Council: namely Putin, Chirac, and Zemin (?).

Note that Russia and France are on that list.. >:T
on Feb 04, 2006
Even if Saddam had broken U N Resolutions, which I believe he did, what gave the United States the authority to enforce the U N Resolutions? When did the U.S. become the enforcement agent for the U N Security Council?
on Feb 04, 2006
Great expose of a foolish attempt to discredit Prs. Bush and PM Blair.

I'm just wondering when the media is going to wake up to the fact that a memo is NOT a policy letter.
on Feb 04, 2006
The facts on the ground have discredited Bush. Just about EVERYTHING we were told about this war have turned out to be untrue. From WMD, to the cost, who was to pay the cost, the length of the war (quick and clean Bush told us) and how we would be greeted were all 100% WRONG. What more could add to the proof that Bush mislead us into a war that has NOT MADE US SAFER!
on Feb 04, 2006
FLASH
In 2002, Bush entered into a triple super secret treaty with the U N to be the enforcer-in- charge under his power as the Supreme Emperor of the known and unknown Universe! Now we know why Bush invaded Iraq. I wonder who is next?
on Feb 04, 2006
Even if Saddam had broken U N Resolutions, which I believe he did, what gave the United States the authority to enforce the U N Resolutions? When did the U.S. become the enforcement agent for the U N Security Council?


I'm getting "VERY" tired of your ignorance. Lets start with he "fact" that EVERY nation that is on the security concil is responcible for enforcing UN resolutions. And as one of the biggest on that council it "usually" falls to us first. Again this is stuff you should know and not have an ex-enlisted man telling you this stuff.

The facts on the ground have discredited Bush. Just about EVERYTHING we were told about this war have turned out to be untrue. From WMD


Have you seen this yet?


Iraq's WMD Secreted in Syria, Sada Says

By IRA STOLL - Staff Reporter of the Sun
January 26, 2006


The man who served as the no. 2 official in Saddam Hussein's air force says Iraq moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria before the war by loading the weapons into civilian aircraft in which the passenger seats were removed.


For all those that said/say there were no WMD's. This person who was right there says you're wrong.
on Feb 04, 2006
Syria has WMD?

Turn left.
on Feb 04, 2006
drmiler

You are DEAD WRONG. Only through the U N is such action authorized. Each member DOES NOT have the authority to act FOR the UN. You ignorance has nothing to do with you being enlisted you just do not know what you are talking about! The way Bush and Cheney got the war resolution passed is by making people believe Saddam was a threat and the major element was a nuclear program that did not exist. The Cheney mushroom cloud was all BS. Bush was told that was not correct by the CIA, Dept of Energy and DSA. He did not listen because to do so would have prevented him from invading Iraq.
on Feb 04, 2006
Who's next? IRAN is next, and it will be over their "nucular" program. so we'll turn right.

Oh, it is possible to shoot down a U2, ask Gary Powers. Did Iraq have the means? Ask the experts.

on Feb 04, 2006
The man who served as the no. 2 official in Saddam Hussein's air force says Iraq moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria before the war by loading the weapons into civilian aircraft in which the passenger seats were removed.


For all those that said/say there were no WMD's. This person who was right there says you're wrong.


I'm sure this guy is the epitome of credibility. At this point I'm sure he'll say anything to save his ass. And of course, if he says he was "right there" he must have been. The honchos of Saddam's regime were sooo honorable.



on Feb 04, 2006
Now that they have been caught in an outright fabrication, anything they have or will say on the subject should be doubted first and beleived not at all.


Who are you saying fabricated it?
on Feb 05, 2006
1. A U2 aircraft flies far above the limit of a surface-to-air or air defense missile. 70,000 feet (approx.) is a long way for a targeting computer or a missile


and yet the russians managed to do just that back on may 1, 1960 as did cuba on october 27, 1962.

maybe they used slide rules rather than computers?
2 Pages1 2