These are my random musings. Hopefully they will be witty, insightful, and frequently updated.
Opening his mouth against Canada's popular will
Published on January 23, 2006 By singrdave In International
It was bound to happen sooner or later - Michael Moore's ritual destruction of politics, this time on both sides of the border. Now he's into Canadian electoral interference.



Next time Moore comes to Canada, he should be charged with violating the Canada Elections Act s. 331:

331. No person who does not reside in Canada shall, during an election period, in any way induce electors to vote or refrain from voting or vote or refrain from voting for a particular candidate unless the person is

(a) a Canadian citizen; or

( a permanent resident within the meaning of subsection 2(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

2000, c. 9, s. 331; 2001, c. 27, s. 211.



Michael Moore publicly announced this statement Friday:

Oh, Canada -- you're not really going to elect a Conservative majority on Monday, are you? That's a joke, right?

These are no ordinary times, and as you go to the polls on Monday, you do so while a man running the nation to the south of you is hoping you can lend him a hand by picking Stephen Harper because he's a man who shares his world view. Do you want to help George Bush by turning Canada into his latest conquest? Is that how you want millions of us down here to see you from now on? The next notch in the cowboy belt? C'mon, where's your Canadian pride? I mean, if you're going to reduce Canada to a cheap download of Bush & Co., then at least don't surrender so easily. Can't you wait until he threatens to bomb Regina? Make him work for it, for Pete's sake.

But seriously, I know you're not going to elect a guy who should really be running for governor of Utah. Whew! I knew it! You almost had me there. Very funny. Don't do that again. God, I love you, you crazy cold wonderful neighbors to my north. Don't ever change.

Michael Moore



Could it be any more clear that Moore is inducing people not to vote for Stephen Harper, a guy who "should really be running for governor of Utah", not the Prime Minister of Canada? As Moore is not a Canadian citizen, he is not entitled by Canadian law to influence this election. For all those free speech types out there, this is seen as a restriction of right. Sure, it may be. But it is the law. And for all those who respect the rule of law should have no problem condemning Moore. After all, the elections laws have so far held up in Court, with the Courts saying that the government has a right to restrict freedom of speech in an election (specifically, the restriction of publishing Atlantic results in the BC time zone before their polls close).

People like Moore ought to be charged when they come up to Canada.

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jan 23, 2006
Asphinctersayswhat.

Michael asks, "What?" ::
on Jan 23, 2006
Here now, what's all this abooot?

Ah well, I'll forgive him. Mainly because he's right. (right as opposed to wrong. )

I'll talk to my bother in the RCMP. He'll get off, believe me.
on Jan 23, 2006

I'll talk to my bother in the RCMP. He'll get off, believe me.

Too bad.  Aiding and abetting scofflaws does not reform them, only encourages them. Today you agree with him.  Tomorrow you may not.  Be careful of the dogs you lie down with.  You may get up with fleas.

on Jan 23, 2006
lock his fat azz up till he is skinny.. no sentence just those terms.
on Jan 23, 2006
I congratulate Michael Moore for capitalizing on the American dream. What all my years didn't prepare me for was how easily celebrity status can be had with a few well placed lies. Just think, all it takes is some creative editing and stretching the truth to get documentary status.
on Jan 24, 2006

stretching the truth to get documentary status

He stretched it into a lie.

But I feel sorry for the Canadians.  They got the kiss of death.  Every time Michael Moron supports a candidate, they lose!

on Jan 24, 2006
Titan:
I congratulate Michael Moore for capitalizing on the American dream.

And yet he felt compelled to share his bilious and rampaging feelings on an unsuspecting Canada...

Guy:
Every time Michael Moron supports a candidate, they lose!

Ya gotta admit, Michael's endorsement means a lot... to the opposition.
on Jan 24, 2006
Liberalism is losing. They just don't understand that liberalism is one it's way out, and they have no idea why.
on Jan 25, 2006
This would be an interesting case considering: 1) Proof of intent must be demonstrated; one must show that he willfully put it forth to the Canadian citizens. 2) There is a loophole if one of the terms in the "law" is defined as it is normally defined in many codes under admiralty law.

'til dawn...
on Jan 25, 2006
I'm no lawyer, but let me weigh in on this:
1) Proof of intent must be demonstrated; one must show that he willfully put it forth to the Canadian citizens.

He "willfully" put it up on his website, listing his own name as author. Even if it was ghost-written, it still was posted on the website bearing his name and face and did not list any alternate author.

2) There is a loophole if one of the terms in the "law" is defined as it is normally defined in many codes under admiralty law.

Again, not being a lawyer, I have no idea what that means.
on Jan 25, 2006
Posting / placement to his own website is not putting it forth to/ soliciting Canadian citizens. That is what you have to prove. Jurisdiction of the "law" is defined.

'til dawn...
on Jan 25, 2006

Posting / placement to his own website is not putting it forth to/ soliciting Canadian citizens. That is what you have to prove. Jurisdiction of the "law" is defined.

How about if he posted it on a Canadian Web Server?

on Jan 25, 2006
That is fine if you can prove that by putting it on a Canadian webserver "he" was putting it forth to / soliciting Canadian citizens. Then you have him. Otherwise, chalk it up to a lesson learned.

However, there is still part two, of a possible loophole in the terminology of the "law".

'til dawn...
on Jan 25, 2006

That is fine if you can prove that by putting it on a Canadian webserver "he" was putting it forth to / soliciting Canadian citizens. Then you have him. Otherwise, chalk it up to a lesson learned.

I was not trying to prove it with Mickey.  I was just curious.

besides, given his track record, I would expect the Liberals to put out a contract on him for his kiss of death.

on Jan 26, 2006
Surfer:
Posting / placement to his own website is not putting it forth to/ soliciting Canadian citizens. That is what you have to prove.

So Canadians don't have access to American internet sites? News to me.

I thought that by addressing his diatribe towards our "most important neighbors to the north" that he was trying to get the attention of the people of Canada.

Guess I must have been wrong?

Guy:
I would expect the Liberals to put out a contract on him for his kiss of death.

Indeed, an endorsement from Michael Moore is unwelcome, at best. (That is probably the understatement of the day.)
2 Pages1 2