Our President doesn't speak for the country or anything
Iran retracted its statement that they'd like to see Israel wiped from the map. From the BBC:
Iran says it has no intention to attack Israel despite a call by its president to have it "wiped off the map". Iran's foreign ministry said Tehran respected the UN charter and had never used or threatened to use force. But it also rejected a UN Security Council statement condemning President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad over his remarks.
Oh no, our PRESIDENT doesn't speak for the sovereign nation of Iran. We really didn't mean that. We wouldn't attack the county that's the embodiment of our sworn enemies, the Jews. As Muslims, we love Jews. NO, really we do. We certainly don't want anyone to think that our nuclear ambitions and our stated hatred of Israel have anything in common... oops, did I let that slip out?
The comments were seen by the outside world as a threat and the reaction from Iran is an effort to calm the outcry, says the BBC's Tehran correspondent. The BBC's Frances Harrison says this is the closest Iran has come to saying it will not attack Israel.
WOW, what a promise. Let's take a look back at the original statement...
"Ahead of the UN session demanded by Israel, President Ahmadinejad stood by his'just' remarks. He attended the Jerusalem Day rally in Tehran which Iran organises every year to show solidarity with the Palestinian struggle. Shouting 'Death to Israel, death to the Zionists', the protesters dragged Israeli flags along the ground and set them on fire. Mr. Ahmadinejad said: 'My words were the Iranian nation's words. Westerners are free to comment, but their reactions are invalid.'"
Oh yeah, he was definitely vacillating and unsure of himself.
So my question is, are they retracting their president's statement due to an actual policy change, or due to the public outcry?