These are my random musings. Hopefully they will be witty, insightful, and frequently updated.
Bringing good will and peace to the most hardened anti-American
Published on August 23, 2007 By singrdave In War on Terror
The preconception regarding terrorism is that it is a poor man’s last hope – that only the dispossessed and desperate cling to violence. However, the demographics of the perpetrators of the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 tell a different story: modern, intelligent, educated, and well-off members of society who were attracted to jihad. These men felt such violence was justified because this was part of a larger campaign against the US and the West in the name of Allah. They had been educated in the ways of jihad at madrassas and clerical schools throughout Asia, including some time spent in Taliban training camps in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Going forward, potential jihadists must be taught that while jihad is a pillar of Islam, it is not meant to be the violent overthrow of society. Mohammed did not advocate the killing of innocents. Jihadists can be shown that their lives can be productive and helpful, both to themselves and their families. The so-called youth bulge that is now threatening Middle Eastern nations will bring millions of youth to working age with no hope of employment or education within their own nations. They are thus negatively motivated, led through apathy and disillusionment towards violence. Male youth, typically from the ages of 16-30, are the most likely demographic group to join a jihad. Mullahs and clerics therefore recruit from amongst these people, looking for those who are willing to fight – the pretext is that the battle is against those who supposedly brought such oppression on the Muslim people, thus causing their lack of future.

Western nations must provide opportunities to these disaffected and potentially dangerous youth. Through foreign aid and scholarship opportunities in other nations, such disaffection would be seriously undermined. An Iranian male will be far less likely to rage against the West if he has just received a degree from a Western university while living abroad. This also solves societal antipathy towards the West – give 50,000 scholarships to American universities to Iranian youth, sit back and watch the ill will subside. They return to their nations better educated and more productive. They have a vision for the future and good feelings towards their benefactors.

These potential soldiers-in-training must see that their activities are not the way to live nor are they the way to die. The US can spearhead efforts to disseminate feelings of goodwill and peace.

Comments
on Aug 23, 2007
I'm trying to become a grand strategist.
on Aug 23, 2007
An Iranian male will be far less likely to rage against the West if he has just received a degree from a Western university while living abroad. This also solves societal antipathy towards the West – give 50,000 scholarships to American universities to Iranian youth, sit back and watch the ill will subside. They return to their nations better educated and more productive. They have a vision for the future and good feelings towards their benefactors.


Actually foreign exchanges from poor to rich countries generally make the exchangee feel contempt for the rich but undeserving and disgust for their poor brothers.

Despite their education they still won't be able to get jobs back home and more importantly they won't be able to participate in the political process, which they would now consider is their right. So they would work against their dictatorships.

Islam is the perfect vehicle for anti-state populism and politics in the Middle East.

Support the revolutions, you might have some success ending terrorism. But educating people without removing the source of their resentments isn't going to improve things.


These potential soldiers-in-training must see that their activities are not the way to live nor are they the way to die. The US can spearhead efforts to disseminate feelings of goodwill and peace.


If your life has no meaning why should death be so frightening? The apathy and helplessness you mention is the real problem, and the US is known to be supporting the causes of apathy and helplessness throughout the region.
on Aug 24, 2007
Islam is the perfect vehicle for anti-state populism and politics in the Middle East. Support the revolutions, you might have some success ending terrorism.

Maybe I'm not understanding you correctly -- are you advocating the violent overthrow of Middle Eastern countries in an effort to STOP terrorism?
So rather than try and foster education and opportunity in these nations, you would advocate their violent overthrow? Who would you like to see enact this revolution? And who would you like to see take over? The moderates wouldn't start the coup -- it would be the radicals and the crazies.

the US is known to be supporting the causes of apathy and helplessness throughout the region.

That may be true to a point, but the problems are endemic to their own countries and the way that they are governed. Allow several thousand students to come over for four to six years, see what the West is like, then go back with a new sense of how things SHOULD BE RUN... and then you'll see a bloodless coup.
on Aug 24, 2007
Maybe I'm not understanding you correctly -- are you advocating the violent overthrow of Middle Eastern countries in an effort to STOP terrorism?
So rather than try and foster education and opportunity in these nations, you would advocate their violent overthrow? Who would you like to see enact this revolution? And who would you like to see take over? The moderates wouldn't start the coup -- it would be the radicals and the crazies.


Basically my approach to unsettled nations and dictatorships is very much pro-self determination. If the only rallying point for unity is Islam, then so be it. It won't last the political realities - just look at Iran. Less than 30 years and the regime is crumbling beneath the weight of a secularism it's struggling to hide.

All this buggering around with exchange programs is a waste of time if we're going to be propping up the very sources of resentment, as we will indelibly be associated with the evil back home.

Look at Saudi Arabia - brutal dictatorship with a vicious internal security force. It sends lots of citizens overseas to study, yet it's probably the biggest source of terrorists in the world. Why? The west supports the subjugation of the Saudi people. Of course that's ignoring the role of the Wahhabi clerics in the monarchy, but I'm sure you can see the connection.

Take East Timor. It's more or less kept stable by foreign peacekeepers and there's a big population of disaffected youths who take to the streets every once in a while out of resentment.

It would be far better for East Timor to let it fall to warlords and then, slowly, claw its way out than try to convince disaffected kids to act like civilised human beings. That's not going to work - they can see there aren't any opportunities except those seized through violence or leaving the country.
on Aug 24, 2007
Support the revolutions, you might have some success ending terrorism. But educating people without removing the source of their resentments isn't going to improve things.


Before you can remove the source of resentment, you first have to really understand what it is - from their perspective, not filtered through Western logic. As to what that real resentment is, thats a whole new article. However much of the Western versions of why this takes place is wholey different from the activist's. Whether the latter is right or wrong is irrelevent, to fight an "enemy" you must first properly understand that enemy through their eyes, not your own, else your "remedies" will be completely mistargeted, and make the situation worse. Not every Muslim is a Jihadist, far far from it despite emotive Western popularist opinion.

As for supporting Revolutions, that should be exercised with extreme caution. Whilst there are exceptions in History (as always), it is nonetheless a lesson of History that you should not get involved in anothers Civil War, it virtually always ends in tears. Not least because nearly always a whole new generation of disaffected people are created far removed from the original grievence, perpetuating the unrest, and lengthening the conflict considerably.
on Aug 25, 2007

As for supporting Revolutions, that should be exercised with extreme caution. Whilst there are exceptions in History (as always), it is nonetheless a lesson of History that you should not get involved in anothers Civil War, it virtually always ends in tears. Not least because nearly always a whole new generation of disaffected people are created far removed from the original grievence, perpetuating the unrest, and lengthening the conflict considerably.


Sure. Borders should be closed with the country and then they can be left to sort it out for themselves. I'm not advocating assisting any particular side in a revolution, merely an end to the propping up of governments. It just doesn't seem to do any good.
on Aug 27, 2007
Basically my approach to unsettled nations and dictatorships is very much pro-self determination. It won't last the political realities - just look at Iran. Less than 30 years and the regime is crumbling beneath the weight of a secularism it's struggling to hide.

Armed revolution is quite self-determinatory, that's for sure. I'm not sure that I'd use Iran as an example, though... they're still around thirty years later and "crumbling" isn't the same as extinct. Personal freedoms are not strong in Iran and that's the legacy of violent Muslim revolution. I'm not sure your option is the right one.
on Aug 28, 2007
Personal freedoms are not strong in Iran and that's the legacy of violent Muslim revolution. I'm not sure your option is the right one.


But they're still stronger than they were under the Shah's tyranny. You have to admit it's safer in Iran now for dissidents than it was with SAVAK still running the show. At least these days they only get tortured a little before being executed. They don't get tortured to death.

Slight improvement, sure, but still superior to the previous, Western-supported option.