Is an $800K float the best use of reconstruction funds?
God bless New Orleans and God bless Mardi Gras. Honestly, it's a fun time in the ol' town, and the parade was subdued but still a good time. People looked as though they were having a ball.
But then I heard something that was very disconcerting. Something that made me think about post-Katrina money...
Nice floats! Where is all the money for Mardi Gras coming from?!
I know they are having a huge shortfall of funds yet the city is spending up to $800,000 per float! Wouldn't that money be better spent on reconstruction and repair?
From March 1st's Washington Post:
In the immediate wake of Hurricane Katrina, many Americans were enthusiastic about helping Gulf Coast evacuees and rebuilding New Orleans. In the months since, indifference has grown. Charities that collected $3 billion after the storm find that they are now unable to meet the demands of the hundreds of thousands of remaining homeless. A Post article ("Two-Thirds of Katrina Donations Exhausted") reported Monday that charities are still "swamped" by a disaster that will require many more years, and many more dollars, to repair. Many Gulf Coast residents, national politicians and ordinary Americans have all, at times, been tempted to give up the struggle to rebuild, and to move on -- elsewhere.
So I ask you, is the New Orleans economy strong enough to support Mardi Gras, or is it so weak that they are hard-up for reconstruction money? Which is it, because it seems to me that the money would be better spent fixing up a storied city like New Orleans than having a giant party.
Kinda reminds me of the film Brewster's Millions, where Richard Pryor has 30 days to spend $30 million dollars... and have nothing to show for it.