These are my random musings. Hopefully they will be witty, insightful, and frequently updated.
Reading PC into children's lit
Published on February 24, 2006 By singrdave In Movies & TV & Books
Well, JU isn't up yet but I have some stuff to say...

It's the start of a fresh new movie week and already controversy.

There's this apparent uproar over "Curious George". And of course it's coming from the animal rights lunatics and other assorted libs. And then there's the complaint that the Man in the Yellow Hat represents imperialism. Link


For the politically correct Bay Area parent, the "Curious George" children's books are a minefield of cultural horrors through which to tiptoe. Imperialism. Animal abuse. Bad parenting.

Puh-leeeeze, George's defenders say. They're children's books, whose charm has not dimmed -- 25 million books and countless swag sold -- even if ideas about political correctness have evolved since the first George adventure was published in 1941. Sometimes a speechless, mischievous monkey is just that -- a monkey, not a metaphor. Besides, George's tales are no more un-PC than those of that royalist warmonger, Babar.

Both camps are wondering how "Curious George," the animated movie that premieres today, will translate details of the popular series of children's books for the more heightened sensitivities of 2006.

The Curious George oeuvre was the work of the husband-and-wife team of H.A. and Margaret Rey, German Jews who escaped France with the first book's manuscript as the Nazis invaded. Most of the seven stories they wrote feature the antics of a monkey whose sweet curiosity gets him in trouble until he's rescued by the nameless Man with the Yellow Hat, George's keeper/parental figure/pal with bail money.

To some, that's the core of an unhealthy relationship.

"The books are really irresponsible to me. It's sickening, really," said Robin Roth, managing editor of www.arkonline.com, an animal welfare Web site.

Start with the Caucasian, gun-carrying Man with the Yellow Hat venturing to Africa (imperialism alert!) to harvest wildlife for a zoo (animal repression alert!). Continue with George being unsupervised and allowed to smoke a pipe and huff ether (bad parenting alert!), and it's a wonder there aren't pickets already forming around movie theaters.

Roth, a high school English teacher in Los Angeles, writes on her animal rights Web site that "Curious George" reveals "the sinister side of a corrupt wildlife trade with perilous roots in Western imperialism." When the mischievous George is sent to jail, "the picture of the forlorn little primate alone in his cell conjures haunting images of countless monkeys lingering in laboratories, suffering silently and alone."


These people need to just get a life and come to terms with what they are doing. Basically throwing a hissy fit over a kid's book.

Pretty soon they are going be saying that Elmo is a Republican just because he's red and acts like a child.

Comments
on Feb 24, 2006
Obviously these people have nothing else to do with their time than complain about non-issues.
on Feb 24, 2006
I can't wait to see the movie.

It looks funny and adorable...and the voice acting includes Will Ferrell, Drew Barrymore, and David Cross. Excellent!

RE: The actual content of your article...

Anything we watch, read, hear, view, etc., can be interpreted any number of ways. We can find sinister significance in anything and everything, if we so choose. It's silly (and sad) to ruin a childhood pleasure with paranoid politics.
on Feb 25, 2006
This issue is a great litmus test. Anyone who complains about Curious George and the Man in the Yellow Hat automatically identifies themselves as someone you know you never have to listen to ever again. ;~D
on Feb 26, 2006
We can find sinister significance in anything and everything, if we so choose. It's silly (and sad) to ruin a childhood pleasure with paranoid politics.

Anyone who complains about Curious George and the Man in the Yellow Hat automatically identifies themselves as someone you know you never have to listen to ever again.

Yes, that was my point. Absolutely ridiculous to believe that there is anything insidious embedded inside "Curious George". For crying out loud.
on Feb 28, 2006
So stupid; and what a waste of time.
Of course, finding (and inventing) reasons to be offended and seeking hidden agendas and obscure meanings where none exist are the stock in trade of the Loonie Left. They also delight in pointing out oppression where it is not.

It surprises me, given all the lib'ral uproar, that Drew Barrymore, a member in good standing of the Inner Circle of The Hollywood Limousine Lefty Flako Whackjobs, would be lending her many and varied talents. I bet she loses some of her immense cache on that front. No matter; she's still a babe.

Reminds me:
I remember reading breathless reports, from several lib'ral sites, naturally, that the growing repression, tyranny and aggression in the Galactic Republic, as depicted in "Star Wars Ep. 3", was a jab directed at the Bush Admin. (forgetting, of course, that the story was originally written in 1973).
If that was indeed the case, they perhaps should have gotten another actor to play the evil Chacellor Palpatine. Maybe one who looks a little less like Robert Byrd.