These are my random musings. Hopefully they will be witty, insightful, and frequently updated.
Religious people are stupid, and smart people aren't religious, apparently...
Published on May 1, 2006 By singrdave In Religion
I found a very incendiary article yesterday on Wikipedia regarding the correlation between religiosity and intelligence. It copiously documents how the more religious you are, the stupider you are. And the smarter you are, the less likely it is that you are have religious feeling...

From Wikipedia:
In 1986, the magazine Sceptic summarized studies on religiosity and intelligence:

All but four of the forty-three polls listed support the conclusion that native intelligence varies inversely with degree of religious faith; i.e., that, other factors being equal, the more intelligent a person is, the less religious he is.

Conclusions -- In this essay:

1. sixteen studies of the correlation between individual measures of student intelligence and religiosity, all but three of which reported an inverse correlation.
2. five studies reporting that student bodies with high average IQ and/or SAT scores are far less religious than lower-scoring student bodies;
3. three studies reporting that geniuses (IQ 3+ standard deviations above average) are much less religious than the general public, and one dubious study;
4. seven studies reporting that highly successful persons are much less religious in belief than are others; and
5. eight old and four new Gallup polls revealing that college alumni (average IQ about one standard deviation above average) are much less religious in belief than are grade-school pollees.

RECENT STUDIES:
In Explorations: An undergraduate research journal, Regan Clarke reports religious belief and behavior were negatively correlated with SAT scores in the USA. In 2000, noted skeptic Michael Shermer found a negative correlation between education and religosity in the United States, though Rice University indicates this may not apply to the social sciences.

Several studies on Americans focus on the beliefs of high-IQ individuals. In one study, 90% of the general population surveyed professed a distinct belief in a personal god and afterlife, while only 40% of the scientists with a BS surveyed did so, and only 10% of those considered "eminent.". Another study found that mathematicians were just over 40%, biologists just under 30%, and physicists were barely over 20% likely to believe in God.

A 1998 survey by Larson and Witham of the 517 members of the United States National Academy of Sciences showed that 72.2% of the members expressed "personal disbelief" in a personal God while 20.8% expressed "doubt or agnosticism" and only 7.0% expressed "personal belief". This was a follow-up to their own earlier 1996 study which itself was a follow-up to a 1916 study by James Leuba.


Some would say, no surprise there. But I would say, let me go out and get me some larnin', so's I can break the curve!

Comments (Page 7)
7 PagesFirst 5 6 7 
on Jun 10, 2006
Because we live in an environment where discrimination is a dirty word, even at a personal level. It is distasteful to us now as a society to write off people because of the color of their skin, or their sexual preferences, etc. Yet in so doing we have achieved a culture where religious belief, one of the foundation aspects of ourselves that is unchallengably protected, is commonly used to discount us as intelligent citizens.

How do you think people would respond if someone discounted the typically democratic votes of racial minorities? If someone said "Oh, sure, of course they vote Democrat, they're (whatever color). How then should we feel when people discount our political and social opinions when they find out we are religious? Of course it isn't because we think and feel and learn, it is because the 'Bible said so'.

If you can't see why we wouldn't take offense at that, you aren't giving it much thought. I have no doubt if someone asked you why a black man in America would get steamed over being discounted for his race. Well, religious tolerance is just as fundamental in the ideals of our nation as racial tolerace.


The old adage "I couldn't have said it better myself" comes quickly to mind. Thanks and have a cookie for your thoughts.

Does my opinion count for more if I was an athiest? A Buddhist? A pagan? Because if it does, then Christians are being unfairly prejudiced against.
on Jun 10, 2006
Wow, I just can't decide which is more pathetic and masturbatory, those who feel the need to attack a religion or those who feel the need to defend it.
on Jun 11, 2006
"I've asked once before, and it's worth asking again: why does disrespect for your religious ideas shown (or imagined) 'steam' you so much?"

Perhaps you are one of the few dozen people in the world who does not take any offense when shown disrespect in any verbal way whatsoever?
on Jun 11, 2006
I've asked once before, and it's worth asking again: why does disrespect for your religious ideas shown (or imagined) 'steam' you so much?

Perhaps you are one of the few dozen people in the world who does not take any offense when shown disrespect in any verbal way whatsoever?

It's not that I want my RELIGIOUS beliefs to be accepted by all, or that I'm forcing people to agree with my way of life.

It irritates me when people equate religious feeling with irrationality.

It irritates me when my opinions on political issues or social issues are dismissed because I am a Christian.

Or, as Baker put it:
Because we live in an environment where discrimination is a dirty word, even at a personal level. It is distasteful to us now as a society to write off people because of the color of their skin, or their sexual preferences, etc.

Why would you revile me for being prejudiced against (fill in the blank) and yet you can be as prejudiced as you like against me on any issue because we happen to have differing religions?

For example, read anything Janeane Garofalo has written about what she perceives as the middle-aged, white, Conservative Christian and their threat to society.
7 PagesFirst 5 6 7